Social Studies, 31.10.2019 08:31 leothedrifter

Asap 25points
why do citizens need to be able to critically evaluate information about policies presented in social media?
a. the media promote the government's preferred interpretation of stories.
b. media outlets can choose to focus on certain parts of a story to influence readers.
c. new forms of media have been popular in the past few decades.
d. most americans get their news from unreliable online sources.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:30

If a swimmer is traveling at a constant speed of 0.85 m/s,how long would it take to swim the length of a 50m olympic sized pool?

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:00

The missouri compromise angered because congress had allowed slavery to expand into another state. 1.) thomas jefferson 2.) northerners 3.) white southerners 4.) henry clay

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:30

Which of these would be describing a developed country? a) literacy rate of 84% b) life expectancy of 58 years c) post-secondary education rate of 10% d) infant mortality rate of 3 per 1,000 births

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Asap 25points
why do citizens need to be able to critically evaluate information about policie...

Questions

Social Studies, 15.09.2020 23:01

What in the world is Philosophy...