subject
Social Studies, 04.11.2019 23:31 xxaurorabluexx

Suppose a political candidate criticizes a government pollution permit policy that she says lets corporations buy and sell the right to pollute. she argues that our right to breathe and the future of our planet require real regulation instead of this type of government policy. which of the following describes why most economists would disagree with her statement? a. clean air is a fundamental right, and government regulation will allow too much pollution. b. a corrective tax would result in a more efficient outcome than either tradable permits or government regulation would. c. a free market in tradable pollution permit is typically more efficient than government regulation. d. the environment is so important that it should be protected as much as possible, regardless of the cost.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 20:30
Select the word from the list that best fits the definition sun-dried mud bricks used to build homes in the desert southwest
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 23:30
Where do buyers and sellers go to exchange a specific product
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
An employee of the state government always received his state paycheck on the last workday of the month. the employee was not a good money manager, and just barely managed to make it from paycheck to paycheck each month. on the second to the last workday of the month, the employee had $45 in his checking account, and, needing to buy a birthday gift for his sister, he wrote a check to a gift boutique for $100. he knew that he would be receiving his paycheck the next day, so he could deposit the paycheck before the check would be sent to the bank.however, unbeknownst to the employee, the state legislature was having a budget impasse. because the state constitution prohibited any deficit spending, state employees were not paid as usual. without a paycheck to deposit, the check written to the gift boutique was returned for insufficient funds. the merchant complained to the police, who arrested the employee and charged him under a statute that prohibited "issuing a check knowing that it is drawn against insufficient funds, with intent to defraud the payee of the check."what should be the outcome of the employee's prosecution? a not guilty, because the employee intended to deposit his paycheck the next day.b not guilty, because it was reasonable for the employee to expect that he would receive his paycheck as usual.c guilty, because the employee knew when he wrote the check that he did not have sufficient funds in his account to honor it.d guilty, because reliance on a future source of income does not vitiate the employee's violation of the statute when he wrote the check.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 10:50
Does anyone know the answers to the australia and the pacific test? here is one of the questions: "which is the correct order of events related to the history of australia and new zealand? place the earliest event at the top and the last event at the bottom." 1. australia and new zealand become dominions. 2. world war 1 occurs. 3. australia and new zealand become independent countries. 4. british recognizes australia and new zealand as equals to britain under the british crown. , i need the correct order down below. i need to submit fast and do not waste my time.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Suppose a political candidate criticizes a government pollution permit policy that she says lets cor...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 11.10.2019 09:00
Questions on the website: 13722361