Monroe is reviewing an appellate case for class and must correctly identify the parties to the case. in the case, the original defendant (franklin) is appealing his conviction by the state of idaho. in the appeals case, franklin is known as the: a. respondent. b. defendant. c. appellant. d. appellee.

(c) appellant

Explanation:

An appellant party is somebody who applies to a higher court to request  the court  to reexamine the decision that is made by a lower court. A litigant must show that he has adequate justification for a request, which are normally characterized by the resolution, so as to challenge a judgment.

So option (c) is the correct option

  a) written constitution. also known as magna carta and a necessity of the democracies that form federations to regulate the principles by which the government will be governed, because if they had to act without a body of specific laws would produce confrontations.

b) territorial division. federalism is constituted by the division of powers on the geographical basis of each territory.

c) decentralization. in a federal system there is both a central government and units of government lower than the central one, each making decisions regarding the provision of certain public services in their respective geographical jurisdictions.

d) supreme court of justice. to counteract the rigidity of the written constitution, judicial action is required to interpret said constitution and necessary changes can be made.

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.