When an ad for everlast fitness equipment encourages bike riders to train harder and states everlast's power packs enable them to recover faster from strenuous training, it is focused on the individual rider's quest for humanitarianism freedom of choice materialism practicality achievement

it is focused on the individual rider's quest for Achievement

Explanation:

An achievement is a success that we obtain after putting an effort , energy and skills. A person who is searching for success that isn't easily achieved will have to go on a quest of putting all their effort in order to achieved what they desire.

Someone who has to train harder and make sure they find means to recover fast are mostly driven by a goal to achieve something , they don't want to waste time they keep consistant pace and don't allow interruptions such a person needs a boost like energy power drink that will assist them to keep going until they achieve their goal ;hence we can safely say this ad is focused on an individual rider's quest for achievement

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.