Sandy found a new job that would pay much more than her current job and, in accordance with company policy, gave her employer two weeks' notice that she would be leaving. upset she was quitting, her employer terminated sandy's employment immediately. sandy cannot start her new job for two weeks. sandy believes her employer has breached her employment agreement, and she should be paid for the two weeks she is unemployed. is she right?

Supreme court. jim, who is a bit eccentric, says that he is fed up with the way a certain employer in his town treats employees and that he is going to sue that employer in an effort to improve matters. jim also says that he is going to start his case at the appellate court level, skipping over all those "lesser" judges. jim says that those justices will surely hear him out and that he will also seek a jury. although he is not a lawyer, jim believes that the offenses of the employer are so severe that the justices will appreciate his attempt to make things better for the employees involved. will jim get a jury at the appellate court level?