Social Studies, 14.11.2019 04:31 myiacoykendall

Randy has been dependent on alcohol for at least ten years. drinking has ruined his marriage, his occupational standing and his health. if a friend told randy that he needed to enter treatment, and randy responded the way most alcohol dependent people do, he would probably say: a. "alcohol is my enemy but i don't think i'm strong enough to combat it"b. "i have an addictive personality, and without , i will never overcome my addiction."c. "you have a very good point, i need to do some serious thinking about getting treatment."d. "who do you think you are attacking me? you are the one with the problem."

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30

Which action allowed farming to be expand into west texas? a inventing a new plow b developing dry farming c increasing demand for cotton worldwide d declining of the cattle ranching industry

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00

What are the basic input of iron and steel industry

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 04:00

Adefendant visited her doctor to seek treatment for a bullet wound. while he was treating the wound, the doctor asked the defendant how she was shot. the defendant replied that she was struck by a police officer’s bullet while running away from a jewelry store she had robbed, but she implored the doctor not to tell this to anyone. the doctor promised that he would not. although the defendant was never charged by the police, the owner of the jewelry store brought suit against her seeking the value of the stolen goods. the defendant denied robbing the store. at the trial, the owner calls the doctor to testify to the statement made to him by the defendant. the defense attorney objects on the ground that such testimony is barred by the jurisdiction’s physician-patient privilege. should the objection be sustained?

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00

Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Randy has been dependent on alcohol for at least ten years. drinking has ruined his marriage, his oc...

Questions