In 2014, the u. s. supreme court upheld the state of michigan's ban on affirmative action. in a passionate dissent, justice sonya sotamayor argued that the law placed an undue burden on racial and ethnic minority students not faced by other applicants. what type of equality was justice sotamayor arguing in favor of?
a. equality of condition
b. equality of outcome
c. ontological equality
d. equality of opportunity

Option A.

Explanation:

Equality of condition, is the right answer.

A political idea that is central to some of the political philosophies and is employed frequently in political discussion, often in opposition to the phase equality of opportunity, is known as the Equality of condition.

In the year 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States maintained the state of Michigan's ban on affirmative action. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a passionate objection, argued that the prior ruling put an unnecessary burden on racial and ethnic minority scholars which is generally not faced by other candidates. In this way, she favoured the equality of condition.

"choosing is refusing" means individuals face an opportunity cost with each decision they make. economists state that every decision involves trade-offs. opportunity cost is the least desirable alternative given up as a result of a decision.

i want to say death; parole, probation, and fines are still being used all the time.