Social Studies, 21.11.2019 18:31 MyaMya12

How freedom of speech protected by the law?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

In the United States, freedom of speech and expression is strongly protected from government restrictions by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, many state constitutions, and state and federal laws. The Supreme Court of the United States has recognized several categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment and has recognized that governments may enact reasonable time, place, or manner restrictions on speech. The First Amendment's constitutional right of free speech, which is applicable to state and local governments under the incorporation doctrine,[1] only prevents government restrictions on speech, not restrictions imposed by private individuals or businesses unless they are acting on behalf of the government.[2] However, laws may restrict the ability of private businesses and individuals from restricting the speech of others, such as employment laws that restrict employers' ability to prevent employees from disclosing their salary with coworkers or attempting to organize a labor union.[3]

The First Amendment's freedom of speech right not only proscribes most government restrictions on the content of speech and ability to speak, but also protects the right to receive information,[4] prohibits most government restrictions or burdens that discriminate between speakers,[5] restricts the tort liability of individuals for certain speech,[6] and prevents the government from requiring individuals and corporations to speak or finance certain types of speech with which they don't agree.[7][8][9]

Explanation:

Answer from: sarahcyberpony

in the US Freedom of speech is established in the first amendment of the constitution. The constitution grants equal protection of all citizens. This can be best explained with the Supreme Court case with Miranda in which the officer who arrested him didn't say he had the right to remain silent Miranda won the case and this was now a law that an officer must read off the person being accused their miranda rights.

Answer from: Quest

just don't strip down in public lol

Answer from: Quest

the technology changed agriculture in an impacting manner since many people left the field work by a cellular or other technological appliances

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 19:00

Answer quickly! correct answers only! how did an agricultural surplus relate to expanded trade during the high middle ages? a)trade increased because surplus crops could be traded. b)trade decreased because surplus crops were needed to feed local populations. c)trade decreased because surplus crops led to an oversupply of grains that could not be sold. d)trade increased regionally but decreased globally because trade networks had shrunk.

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 08:30

Which of the following is a sign of a weak economywhich of the following is a sign of a weak economy

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 13:10

Arepublic is a from of government in which the people

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 15:00

6â€“7. white-collar crime. matthew simpson and others created and operated a series of corporate entities to defraud telecommunications companies, creditors, credit reporting agencies, and others. through these entities, simpson and the others used routing codes and spoofing services to make long-distance calls appear to be local. they stole other firmsâ€™ network capacity and diverted payments to themselves. they leased goods and services without paying for them. to hide their association with their corporate entities and with each other, they used false identities, addresses, and credit histories, and issued false bills, invoices, financial statements, and credit references,. did these acts constitute mail and wire fraud? discuss. [united states v. simpson, 741 f.3d 539 (5th cir. 2014)] (see types of crimes.)