Atherapist treating a client diagnosed with borderline personality disorder came up with the following analysis: the parents probably did not want children in the first place; the child was not accepted; the child developed low self-esteem, dependency, and an inability to cope with separation. the therapist's theoretical orientation is probably:
a. behavioral
b. biological
c. object relations theory
d. cognitive-behavioral theory.

c. Object relations theory

Explanation:

Object relations theory: In psychology, the theory of object relation is defined as the process of constructing a relationship with the other person during childhood. Theorists have suggested that a child not only internalize a specif object but also the relationship with that object, and this relation can either be positive or negative that represents self, object, and emotional link.

In object relation theory, the relationship of a child with the surrounding environment is being described and the mother and child relationship and if this relationship is not properly built then the child might problems later in life.

In the question above, the therapist's theoretical orientation is probably the object relations theory.

hope this .

r3t40

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.