If the government legislates policies that block imports of solar panels and gives domestic manufacturers a $5 billion dollar tax subsidy, the benefits to the u. s. solar panel manufacturing and distribution industry will be very visible. the bearers of the cost of the tax subsidy?

Erika is a human resource manager at bluetel inc., a software company. she receives a call from an hr manager at another software company asking about marshall, a software engineer who used to work at bluetel and has applied for a job at the caller's company. erika checks the company's records and sees that a coworker had accused marshall of racial discrimination, but an investigation did not turn up any evidence to support the charge. marshall left the company two months later, saying he was no longer comfortable there. erika is concerned about sharing the details of this situation with the caller. if telling the information to the caller leads to the other company not hiring marshall, what potentially unlawful behavior could marshall accuse bluetel of engaging in?

Awoman who was socialized from infancy to become a wife and mother settles comfortably into being a homemaker in her twenties and early thirties. however, her husband dies suddenly, and she finds that she must enter the paid labor force in order to support herself and her two children. this woman will most likely have to undergo a process of (1pts) question 19 - a woman who was socialized from infancy to become a wife and mother settles comfortably into being a homemaker in her twenties and early thirties. however, her husband dies suddenly, and she finds that she must enter the paid labor force in order to support herself and her two children. this woman will most likely have to undergo a process of select anticipatory socialization. as your answer anticipatory socialization. select socialization. as your answer socialization. select reverse socialization. as your answer reverse socialization. select resocialization. as your answer resocialization.

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?