Advocates of shifting the task of drawing united states house districts from state legislatures to independent commissions are likely to claim which of the following as an advantage of independent commissions? a. house districts drawn by independent commissions are immune from challenges by the u. s. department of justiceb. independent commissions are more likely to create majority-minority districts where they are appropriatec. independent commissions significantly reduce the influence of partisan gerrymandering in the redistricting processd. independent commissions are more likely to create districts where minor parties can be victoriouse. independent commissions are more able to draw legislative districts that comply with the one person, one vote standard

When analyzing the election of 1876, what conclusion can be drawn? a.a majority of northerners wanted to enforce reconstruction policies more stringently.b.if tilden had won the electoral votes from louisiana, florida, or south carolina, he would have been elected president.c.the republican party had increased its support in the south.d.rutherford hayes did poorly in the western states.e.the republican party did a good job protecting the voting rights of african-americans in mississippi.

What was a main difference between franch conversation and liberals following the congress of vienna

Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.