Theo is injured at work and files a workers' compensation claim, which is administered by the workers' compensation agency in his state. his employer disputes the extent of theo's injuries. the case is heard by an administrative law judge ("alj"), who decides the case in the employer's favor. theo's attorney tells him that the alj's decision cannot be appealed to a court because
a. he must first appeal the case to the workers' compensation board that heads the state agency.
b. the decision of the alj is final in all administrative challenges.
c. he does not have standing to appeal an administrative decision; only the employer could do that.
d. there is not an actual controversy that qualifies for judicial proceedings.

In writing about her findings in a brazilian shantytown, nancy scheper-hughes’s account of alto do cruzeiro provides a window into the terrible toll of nonconsensual organ harvesting among the poor, as well as how she herself changed over time. how might an anthropologist justify the publication of this ethnographic research when considering the problem of ethnographic authority? a. all of the poor must be given an equal voice, thus polyvocality is justification. b. anthropologists are themselves changed in fieldwork, and so honest reflexivity is justification. c. the horrific conditions made it impossible to ignore, and since she obtained informed consent, this is justification. d. authoritative writing asks us to consider what right we have to report, thus a moral challenge is justification.

What best describes how producers benefit from specialization

A“carpetbagger” would have been most likely to come from which state?