subject

As we learned astrology & phrenology are considered pseudosciences because they are either not testable or cannot be verified objectively. think of one other discipline that could be considered a pseudosciences & explain why the content would not be testable or able to be verified objectively

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 19:00
In the mid 1800s western settlers and american indians differed in their views about
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 20:10
Which kind of organism is a heterotroph?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:30
The development of simple stone tools by early hominids led to the ability to procure meat more efficiently. this in turn led to the change in diet that included larger amounts of protein. many scholars believe that this shift in diet was a significant part of how our ancient ancestors adapted so quickly to a varied set of environments, and thus were able to begin cultural development. this demonstrates the intimate connection between
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30
You are bringing together faculty from different behavioral disciplines to author a new textbook in organizational behavior. represented are professors from psychology, sociology, social psychology, anthropology, political science, and industrial engineering. which faculty member is most likely to furnish information about personality, learning, and motivation?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
As we learned astrology & phrenology are considered pseudosciences because they are either not...
Questions
question
History, 19.09.2020 01:01
question
Mathematics, 19.09.2020 01:01
question
Computers and Technology, 19.09.2020 01:01
question
Biology, 19.09.2020 01:01
question
Mathematics, 19.09.2020 01:01
Questions on the website: 13722361