Power trucking company operates a fleet of fuel trucks. when one of the trucks is positioned to receive a load, it strikes a storage tank owned by quality fuel, inc. for the cost of repairing the damage to the tank, quality fuel is most likely to be awarded:
a. compensatory damages.
b. punitive damages.
c. contingency fees.
d. general damages.

Power Trucking Company operates a fleet of fuel trucks. When one of the trucks is positioned to receive a load, it strikes a storage tank owned by Quality Fuel, Inc. For the cost of repairing the damage to the tank, Quality Fuel is most likely to be awarded compensatory damages.

Option A

Explanation:

Compensatory damages refers to money awarded to the plaintiff; in this case Quality Fuel. The money is awarded to compensate for losses, injury or damages. Since the storage tank of Quality Fuel was struck, it must have been damaged and the company incurred losses.

Power Trucking Company was therefore required to pay compensatory charges to compensate for the loss of the storage tanker and any goods in it. Compensatory damages are usually awarded in civil court cases. These are paid when loss or damage takes place because of the negligence or the unlawful behavior or conduct of a party.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

all people shall have equal rights upon birth and ever after. (when referring to the rights of man the declaration of the rights of man only applied to landowning men who were 25 years or older and paid taxes equal to 3 days worth of work and were not servants.

explanation: hope this