How does the interaction of language, religion, ethnicity, and gender cause conflict on different scales?

in addition to traditional psycholinguistic training, children with LI may gain from interventions that support concluding behavioural turns, as in aberrant caused conflicts; and in initiating contact in conflict situations, even when a frame of reference is not immediately available, as was the case when opponents have not established social interaction in the pre-conflict period.

One hundred forty-nine middle class individuals (69 males and 80 females), approximately 80% of whom were Caucasian, participated in a study. The study was designed to test the hypothesis that individuals whose gender role and occupation did not match (i.e., feminine individuals in predominantly male occupations or masculine individuals in predominantly female occupations) would experience more gender role conflict than individuals whose gender role and occupation matched. The hypothesis was supported. A feminine gender role predicted higher gender role conflict in predominantly male occupations, and lower gender role conflict in predominantly female occupations than a masculine gender role. A masculine gender role predicted the lowest gender role conflict scores in predominantly male occupations, and the highest in predominantly female occupations. Furthermore, higher masculinity scores were related to greater gender role conflict for females than males in more predominantly male occupations.

Historically, we can see a similar process at work in the relationship between ancient Judaism and early

Christianity. The early Christians built up an image of pagans and Jews as ‘un-Christian’ in part because

there was quite a bit of contact between the three traditions. John Gager has argued that although

hardliners worked hard to generate and enforce a distinction, Christian and pagan interaction with the

Jewish tradition was not solely negative and that many Christians and pagans engaged creatively with

Judaism (Gager, 1985). Similarly, ideas about heresy developed at least in part out of uncertainty about

what it meant to be an orthodox Christian. When we read the texts of earlier periods it seems obvious

that Christians were always arguing amongst themselves about who was a heretic and who held correct,

orthodox belief. But it might not have been that simple. These conflicts may have flared up precisely

because contact was occurring and movement between groups was seen as a real possibility by those

patrolling community boundaries.

Trying to help more!

Hope this helps!

the biopsychosocial approach was developed at rochester decades ago by drs. the biopsychosocial approach systematically considers biological, psychological, and social factors and their complex interactions in understanding health, illness, and health care delivery.

explanation:

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.