What role did the following play in the crisis?
a. leverage,
b. securitization and derivatives-mbs, cdos, cds,
c. funding mismatch,
d. shadow banking sector,
e. deregulation,
f. too big to fail/moral hazard,
g. wealth effect
h. animal spirits, deleveraging, fire sales

 The correct answer is :  a. Leverage: Crises are more serious when they are accompanied by a credit boom and a very high leverage of market players.

b. securitization and derivatives-mbs, cdos, cds: securitization was the practice of buying mortgages. High risk borrowers with not-so-perfect credit had higher interest rates on their mortgages due to the increased risk of default.

c. . funding mismatch: The banks used securities that were backed by leveraged mortgages and the cash flow did not meet the liabilities.

d. shadow banking sector: Non-bank financial institutions that provide funds but do not have health insurance. Short-term lenders refused to refinance.

e deregulation: Commercial and investment banks assumed large risks due to discrete regulatory changes from 1999 to 2004.

F. too big to fail / moral hazard: The government intervened and saved many companies, because their failure would be a disaster for the general economy.

g. wealth effect: Asset prices increased during the boom years, thus boosting consumption and fueling a drop in the savings rate.

h. animal spirits, deleveraging, fire sales: many institutions needed cash to meet short-term obligations. There was a need to sell assets in the market down.

all freedom fighters demanded for constitution. so british finally granted india it's freedom. then a constituent assembly was formed. it's chair man was rajendra prasad and its deputy chairman was dr. br ambedkar.

this assembly take the time of about one year than our constitution was finally formed.

explanation:

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.