subject
Social Studies, 02.01.2020 22:31 njohns5327home

Which of the following statements exemplify consequentialist reasoning?
can all of them be given consequentialist interpretations if expanded? explain your answers.

a. honesty is the best policy.
b. sue has the right to know the truth.
c. what good is going to come from giving money to a homeless person on the street?
d. there is a symbolic value present in personally giving something to another person in need.
e. it is only fair that you give him a chance to compete for the position.
f. if i do not study for my ethics exam, it will hurt my gpa.
g. if you are not honest with others, you cannot expect them to be honest with you.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:20
Gettysburg address question. lincoln uses the images of birth and rebirth in this address. why?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:30
What is the first half of church mass called?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:30
Consider the speakers in "the raven" and the speaker in "the song of wandering aengus." write two paragraphs to compare and contrast the voice in these two poems. how does the poet give the speaker in each poem a distinctive voice? what effect does this voice have in each poem? use examples from each poem to as evidence for your answer "the raven"once upon a midnight dreary, while i pondered, weak and weary,over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore—while i nodded, nearly napping, suddenly there came a tapping,as of some one gently rapping, rapping at my chamber door.“‘tis some visitor,” i muttered, “tapping at my chamber door—only this and nothing more.”ah, distinctly i remember it was in the bleak december, and each separate dying ember wrought its ghost upon the floor. eagerly i wished the morrow; —vainly i had sought to borrowfrom my books surcease of sorrow—sorrow for the lost lenore—for the rare and radiant maiden whom the angels name lenore—nameless here for evermore.and the silken sad uncertain rustling of each purple curtainthrilled me—filled me with fantastic terrors never felt before; so that now, to still the beating of my heart, i stood repeating“‘tis some visitor entreating entrance at my chamber door—some late visitor entreating entrance at my chamber door; this it is and nothing more.”"the song of wandering aengus." i went out to the hazel wood,because a fire was in my head,and cut and peeled a hazel wand,and hooked a berry to a thread; and when white moths were on the wing,and moth-like stars were flickering out,i dropped the berry in a streamand caught a little silver trout.when i had laid it on the floori went to blow the fire aflame,but something rustled on the floor, and some one called me by my name: it had become a glimmering girlwith apple blossom in her hairwho called me by my name and ranand faded through the brightening air.plz hurry
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:50
Astudy that involves interviews of adults is eligible for expedited review. the researcher wants to add an adolescent population (aged 12 to 17) to the study and has designed a parental permission and assent process. no additional changes are planned. which of the following statements about review of the revised protocol is accurate? the research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents are capable of understanding the same consent forms used for the adult population.the research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents have been declared to be emancipated minors.the new research would need full review by a convened irb because children are a protected population.unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to > minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which of the following statements exemplify consequentialist reasoning?
can all of them be g...
Questions
question
World Languages, 03.10.2020 01:01
Questions on the website: 13722361