What are some of the benefits and drawbacks to relying on dna evidence in a criminal case?

DNA in case of crime can be used as a source of evidence and using DNA as a evidence has both benefits and drawbacks.

Benefits:

Some of the benefits of relying on the DNA as a source of evidence is that there is a high level of accuracy and precision when it comes to DNA because no two DNA sample can be same to add confusion.

The evidence is so strong that the justice will trust on the evidence and will not demand for any other source of evidence.

The criminal records present helps in finding the criminal using the sample.

Drawbacks:

The main drawback is cost. This process is very costly and is not efficient for the low profile case.

The sample gets denatured easily so it has to be maintained in a healthy condition.

The process takes sometime to amplify the DNA and match with the criminal in order to show it in the court.

answer; (cognitive   dissonance);

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.