() apex

imagine that you are a russian worker at the time of the russian revolution of 1917, during the rule of the provisional government that took power after the fall of the czar. write a statement to persuade your fellow workers to support either the provisional government or the bolsheviks. in your letter, be sure to define the positions of each side and explain why you support one side over the other. (10 points)

Russian country was struck by a huge crisis.  The poverty, famine and World War took many of russian citizens. Long hours at work, overcrowded housing, constant risk of injury and death, deplorably sanitary conditions, harsh discipline and inadequate wages indicate that the changes should be made instantly. Cost of living is sky high and people can barely have enough meals for a day. Centuries of oppression of lower classes, from the Tsarist regime and failures in the World War I demand that workers should fight for their freedom. Strikes and bread riots are spreading across the country.

The Bolsheviks promise that the power should be in workers hands. The means of production will be took from the capitalists and be given back to the proletariat. Nationalisation of the land indicate that everyone should be equal in the terms of outcomes, and that the state is the only one that should have a legitimacy over the distribution of goods. The purpose of the state, according to the Bolsheviks is to take care for every citizen in the country, not only for the wealthy.

i disagree that there is little difference between adult female development and adult male development. sociological studies comparing female and male pathways to adulthood, revelead that there are sustancial differences between them. particularly, female and male differ from timing of marriage, when they began to live with children and the likelihood of combining wife/husband and parent roles.

the old way of life was represented by superstition, an angry god, and absolute submission to authority. the thinkers of the age of reason ushered in a new way of thinking. this new way championed the accomplishments of humankind. individuals did not have to accept despair. science and reason could bring happiness and progress. kings did not rule by divine right. they had an obligation to their subjects. europeans pondered the implications for nearly a century. americans put them into practice first.