If this study were administered in an asian country, a pattern of results we could expect to see would be: a. lower meritocracy scores in high-ses students, but higher meritocracy scores in low-ses students. b. higher meritocracy scores in high-ses students, but lower meritocracy scores in low-ses students. c. lower meritocracy scores in both high-ses and low-ses students. d. higher meritocracy scores in both high-ses and low-ses students.

B) Higher meritocracy scores in high-SES students, but lower meritocracy scores in low-SES students.

Explanation:

If this study were administered in an Asian country, a pattern of results we could expect to see would be: higher meritocracy scores in high-SES students, but lower meritocracy scores in low-SES students. Ideally it should not be like this, but since Asia is a very judgemental continent on every single aspect of an individual's life, it does not matter if you are a good student, if you have a low SES position, you will still be judged.

sectionalism continues to divide the nation as the question of slavery being allowed in the mexican cession became a problem. -the results of the mexican war spark secession in the south because the north did not want to allow slavery in the territories won.

i think you really need to revive you answer! : d