Âin the context of supreme court conferences, which of the following statements is true of a dissenting opinion? a) it is expressed by a judge or justice who disagrees with the majority opinion. âb) it refers to the opinion of the chief justice of the supreme court in all cases. âc) it is in agreement with the court's decision, but for reasons different from the majority opinion. âd) it is expressed by a judge or justice who is in agreement with the majority opinion. âe) it refers to a consensual disagreement of all the nine justices to the court's decision.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.