Sasha believes that she is a nice person. to confirm this, she asks all her friends whether she is a nice person; they all agree that she is. sasha concludes that she is a nice person and says she has evidence of it. however, she does not ask any of her enemies whether they think she is a nice person. this is an example of which of the following?
cherry-picking of evidence

Cherry-Picking of Evidence.

Explanation:

Cherry-picking of evidence is the idea in which a person looks for the confirmation of his/her ideas. In this, ideas that are contradicting, and non conforming to one's ideas are neglected and not taken into account. Cherry-picking is also known as the fallacy of incomplete evidence. It can also be defined as a fallacy or wrong reasoning.

In the given case, Sasha was biased in confirming to her idea that whether she is a nice person or not. She confirmed her ideas only with her friends, who would say she is a nice person. She ignored the pieces of evidence from her enemies who may have different notions about her.

So, the correct answer is Cherry-Picking Evidence.

giant impact theory - the moon was formed from the collision between earth and another mars-sized body.

colliding planetesimals hypothesis - the moon was formed from the same cloud of material as earth.

capture hypothesis - the moon was locked into orbit by earths gravity as it was passing by it.

accretion hypothesis - the moon was formed from collisions and combining of planetesimals.

i think this is right, if not and you know better let me know.

answer; decreased;