subject
Social Studies, 24.01.2020 21:31 rayniqueamee2002

Astate's civil procedure rules allow for "nail and mail" service (posting the summons at the defendant's dwelling and thereafter mailing him a copy by certified mail) when "regular" service (service by physical delivery or by leaving a copy of the complaint with someone of suitable age and discretion at the defendant's usual place of abode) cannot be accomplished with due diligence. a plaintiff brought suit against a defendant in the federal district court for that state. after the plaintiff's special process server made many attempts at serving the defendant, the plaintiff's attorney directed the process server to nail the complaint and summons to the defendant's front door, and the attorney mailed (by certified mail) a copy to the defendant in accordance with the state rule.

has the defendant been properly served?

a yes, if "nail and mail" service is reasonably calculated to give the defendant notice of the action.
b yes, because under the erie doctrine the federal court must apply the state's service of process rules.
c no, if the defendant only rented the dwelling at which service was posted.
d no, because "nail and mail" service is not authorized by the federal rules of civil procedure.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:10
Where do the majority of cases heard by the supreme court originate?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:30
Alexander stephens’ opinion on secession and compromise led to what being written? a)the kansas-nebraska act b)the missouri compromise c)the u.s. constitution d)the georgia platform
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
What is the cause of their extinction
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Astate's civil procedure rules allow for "nail and mail" service (posting the summons at the defenda...
Questions
question
Spanish, 31.01.2022 14:00
question
English, 31.01.2022 14:00
question
Mathematics, 31.01.2022 14:00
question
English, 31.01.2022 14:00
question
English, 31.01.2022 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722359