The defendant robbed a bank and fled in a getaway car driven by an accomplice, not realizing that one of the bundles of money he took had the serial numbers recorded and had a tiny tracking device attached to the wrapper. the bank’s security consultant obtained portable tracking equipment and was able to trace the bundle of money to the defendant’s house. the police were notified and they arrived at the defendant’s house a few hours after the robbery. they knocked on the door, announced their presence, and saw someone matching the description of the robber in the hallway. they entered and arrested the defendant, and then conducted a protective sweep of the house for the accomplice, who they believed had a gun. they did not find him, but while checking a closet, they discovered several of the bundles of money from the bank and a gun the defendant had used in the robbery. the police also discovered two clear plastic bags of what appeared to be marijuana sitting on top of a dresser. they seized the money, the gun, and the two bags. later testing confirmed that the substance in the bags was marijuana. the defendant was charged with the bank robbery and with possession of the marijuana. at a preliminary hearing, he moves to suppress introduction of the money, gun, and marijuana. how should the court rule?