Why would maintaining control of the hudson river be a good military strategy? write your response in one to two complete sentences.

pls

It was an important military strategy to control the Hudson river.

Explanation:

British Army wanted to divide rest of the states from New England. It would isolate New England this way.  

New England was the center of the rebellion. Three British armies marched from "New York City, Montreal and Fort Oswego" and met in Albany. Then they seized Hudson River. It formed a natural obstruction along the western side of New England. The British were then able to move South and defeat the Southern colonies.

Thus, it was a very important and good military strategy.

i got 3,4 and 5 as an answer

apart from being against desegregation, governor of georgia eugene talmadge opposed as well to the work progress administration, an ambitious program of the "new deal" created by president franklin d. roosevelt to overcome the great depression after world war i. talmadge disagreed with welfare spending, job training and organized labor. according to his ideas, he thought the government was spending too much money on this, and he wasn't willing to accept a wage higher than georgia's lower average wage. besides, talmadge strongly opposed to the "new deal" as he thought it had communist ideas.