All of the following are common arguments against social responsibility for organizations EXCEPT a. the purpose of businesses in the United States is to generate profit for the owners. b. involvement in social programs gives businesses too much power. c. businesses lack the expertise needed to manage social programs. d. there is potential for conflicts of interest. e. business creates problems and should therefore help solve them.

all of the following in the options are common argument against social responsibilities for organization except "INVOLVEMENT IN SOCIAL PROGRAMS GIVES BUSINESS TOO MUCH POWER". which means option "b" is the correct answer.

Explanation: The social responsibilities of an organization are those responsibilities an organization owes the society.

When a business involves in social programs, like walk for life, giving scholarships, organizing sports competition and many more, it only build and grow the business awareness to the public, it has not added any power to the business to use on the public or to another business. Instead it added value to the lives of the individual involved. Therefore gain of too much power in business involvement in social programs does is not a valid argument against social organization.

the answer is : the nut cases won't quit battling and their recurrence of flights will going to continue as before despite the fact that the battles are less hazardous now because of their bills have all of a sudden been blunted.   in the falcon dove diversion, two creatures will drive towards one another to crush one another, among the two one will win and other will swerve. in this way, clearly, the battle will be dependably there between two creatures for the assets or mate.