How did U. S. secretary of state James G. Blaine, who served under the Garfield and Harrison administrations, promote American expansionist interests abroad?

Explanation:

When James G. Blaine was in office as the U.S Secretary of Sate, he contributed immensely in the promotion of American diplomacy. He served two terms as U.S Secretary of Sate during Garfield and Harrison presidential administration.

Throughout his tenure, he worked hard on promoting American expansionists interests by establishing peaceful relations with the Latin America. He emphasized on the Pan-American Conference which led to the creation of the Pan-American Union in 1890. The union promoted friendship and cooperation among the American continents.

Blaine believed in commercialization and encouraged American commercial expansion in the global platform. He increased the naval power to promote easy and fast import and export of goods and services. This was also done to strengthen the naval force for military purposes.

During his tenure, Blaine mediated in the War of the Pacific from 1879 to 1883 between Bolivia, Chile and Peru. He wanted to establish peace for promoting economic prosperity in the Pacific region. He also inter-mediated on various international conflicts to establish peace among nations.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

answer; earthquake;