In Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), the Supreme Court struck down state laws outlawing the use of contraceptives on the basis of privacy rights. The fact that the Court relied on a right to privacy that is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution makes this decision an example of .

Judicial Activism.

Explanation:

Judicial Activism refers to the judiciary judgment, in which the jury often overlooks the law. In 1947, Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. coined the term "judicial activism". Or, in other words, the term judicial activism can be defined as a decision of the jury that is based on personal opinions rather than on the existing law.

In the given case, the decision of the Supreme Court is an example of Judicial activism because the court's decision was based outside of the law and based solely on their own understanding of public policy.

So, the correct answer is judicial activism.