If the director of the film makes all the decisions without input from others, then this leWhen the director/manager allows employees to guide themselves toward the goal, then leadership style is being used. leadership style is called:.

There are two questions being asked here. I've found them and their respective options online. They are the following:

1. If the director of the film makes all the decisions without input from others, then this leadership style is called

A. democratic.

B. command.

C. autocratic.

D. free-rein.

E. dictatorship.

2. When the director/manager allows employees to guide themselves toward the goal, then a(n) leadership style is being used.

A. democratic

B. self-guided

C. free-range

D. autocratic

E. free-rein

free-rein

The answers are:

1. C. autocratic

2. E. free-rein

Explanation:

Autocratic leaders are little concerned with the interpersonal aspect of decision-making. They center the decision-making process in their own judgments and opinions. Advice and other forms of input are seldom accepted. This type of leader tends to see employees as unreliable, and believe they need to control every step in the process to accomplish a certain result.

On the other hand, the free-rein leadership style, also known as laissez-faire, is characterized by lack of interference. The leaders who practice free-rein value interpersonal relationships over the task itself. They allow employees to make their own decisions to accomplish the organizational objectives.

the atm that sounds like it should be the answer

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.