What is one criticism regarding Geert Hofstede’s research on cultural dimensions?

a. It did not assume a one-to-one correspondence between culture and nation-state.
b. It was too all-encompassing and did not allow for differences.
c. It did not consider physical capabilities.
d. It did not assess cultures affecting the workplace.
e. The research team consisted of only Europeans and Americans.

Geert Hofstedes research on culture "did not assume a one-to-one correspondence between culture and nation-state". Which means option "a" is the most correct option.

Explanation: Geert Hofstedes research on culture, provides both the theoritical and practical comparison of workmen to the reward arena. But his research did not consider the influence a particular individual plays to the arena, his research only consider the influence the reward of the group plays to the reward arena. Even though his work is internationally accepted, but it still has some limitations.

It is considered that Geert, did not carry a one-on-one interaction with individuals, to understand the role each individual culture plays in the nation, which is a contextual facture to determine this research.

according to hess's theory, when the magma cooled, it would expand and push the tectonic plates apart. it would push the north and south america plates to the west and eurasia and africa ones to the east. the atlantic ocean would get wider but the coastlines of the masses would stay the same.

harry hammond hess was a geologist and a united states navy officer in the second world war. he is considered to be one of the founding fathers of the theory of plate tectonics. he is known for his theories on sea floor spreading, stating that the movement of the continents was the result of see floor spreading. the continents are attached to the plates and do not move separately. the plates themselves shift and change shape, carrying the continents along.