subject
Social Studies, 14.02.2020 03:07 AalonsoCV

In her speech on chewing tobacco, Catherine made the following argument:
To be effective, laws governing chewing tobacco sales to minors must be enforced and must have adequate penalties for people who violate the law. My proposal will significantly increase both enforcement provisions and penalties for violators. Therefore, my plan will be effective.
What kind of reasoning did Catherine use?
a. reasoning from principle
b. reasoning from analogy
c. reasoning from specific instances
d. reasoning from expediency
e. reasoning from need

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:00
Why is this statement not a hypothesis? sunflowers require soil and plenty of sunlight and water to grow and thrive. a. it is a well-known fact. b. it is a proven theory. c. it is not falsifiable. d. it is difficult to test.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:30
These two countries developed a strong trading relationship during the time of the renaissance. name them?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30
Attempted crimes are as equally against the law. do you think punishing someone for what they tried to do is as important as punishing someone for what they did do? explain your reasoning and use evidence to back it up.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 24.06.2019 01:00
Which of the following best describes a motivation for entrepreneurial activity?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In her speech on chewing tobacco, Catherine made the following argument:
To be effective, law...
Questions
question
Geography, 13.11.2019 13:31
question
World Languages, 13.11.2019 13:31
question
Mathematics, 13.11.2019 13:31
question
English, 13.11.2019 13:31
question
Geography, 13.11.2019 13:31
Questions on the website: 13722367