The good Samaritan study conducted by Darley and Batson(1973) examined helping behavior in seminary students at Princeton University. These students were either rushed or not rushed to get to an appointment. Results of this study showed that
1.participants who viewed religion as a means toward personal salvation were less likely to help someone than participants who viewed religion as a mean toward moral and spiritual values.
2.when rushed, only participants who viewed religion as a means toward personal salvation were less likely to help someone.
3.when rushed, only participants who viewed religion as a means toward moral and spiritual values were less likely to help someone
4.the nature of participants' religious orientations did not predict helping behavior; only being rushed or not predicted helping.

4.the nature of participants' religious orientations did not predict helping behavior; only being rushed or not predicted helping

Explanation:

The Good Samaritan study was conducted by Princeton social psychologists, John Darley and Daniel Batson, taking inspiration from the parable of the Good Samaritan. Their research was conducted to test people's disposition regarding the acts of the Good Samaritan. They published their results in a 1973 paper titled “From Jerusalem to Jericho.” where they showed "the nature of participants' religious orientations did not predict helping behavior; only being rushed or not predicted helping."

an informal structure in a bureaucracy would be something like so-called "office politics". where there's a formal structure set up for the organization, but then an informal subculture as well that has a way of organizing the bureaucracy further. this can be positive because it sets up an added degree of organization, albeit informal, within the bureaucracy.

was the answer correct?