Although evidence is mounting that high involvement, high performance or high commitment management practices demonstrate positive economic returns, trends in actual management practice are often moving exactly opposite to what this evidence indicates?

Your question is not complete, please let me assume this to be your complete question.

Although evidence is mounting that high involvement, high performance or high commitment management practices demonstrate positive economic returns, trends in actual management practice are often moving exactly opposite to what this evidence indicates?

Is this Statement True or False.

ANSWER: FALSE

Explanation: Management practice are those principles and skills a manager uses to manage an event or resources. For example, staffing method, payment methods, business strategy, and many more.

A positive economics returns is when profit has been made from a business.

In actual management practice, if a manger is committed and high performance of management practice is shown, they will definitely be a good economic returns. A manger will not have a positive returns when he has not applied the best practices for his business, even though, the manager is committed, the performance of such manager will be low which will give a Negative returns or a very poor positive returns

either wyoming or idaho