subject
Social Studies, 18.02.2020 17:28 katlian

Which of the following is NOT a way a defendant can avoid liability under the 1933 act?a. The statement or omission was not material. b. The plaintiff and the defendant conspired to save the company. c. The plaintiff knew about the misrepresentation at the time of purchasing the stock. d. The defendant exercised due diligence in preparing the registration and reasonably believed at the time that the statements were true and there were no omissions of material facts.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:30
How was mussolini able to gain power in italy? he played to the prejudices of the italians. he fought off hitler’s attempt to annex italy. he led a coup to take over a weakened government. he proposed new ideas to solve the economic crisis.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 23:00
The were so closely connected to the tang dynasty that korean elites used chinese as their written language. they set up a statewide academy that trained government officials in the philosophy of .
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:30
Which of the following best describes the reason the state department is interested in foreign exchange programs?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:30
Does the amount of material present affect its intensive or extensive properties? explain.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which of the following is NOT a way a defendant can avoid liability under the 1933 act?a. The statem...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 19.09.2019 21:30
question
Biology, 19.09.2019 21:30
question
Mathematics, 19.09.2019 21:30
Questions on the website: 13722360