Funder and Ozer (1983) converted the results of three classic social psychological studies to effect sizes. After comparing those effect sizes with those typically obtained by personality psychologists, Funder and Ozer concluded that .

The answer is "Both context-sensitive and persona factors were crucial behavioral indicators" .

Explanation:

In the given question some information is missing that is the option of the question which can be described as follows:

a) The triple experiments have been so seriously flawed that we will never infer something on the consistency of actions from contextual factors.

b) The estimate for the differential of a scenario will only be .20.

c) Both context-sensitive and persona factors were crucial behavioral indicators.

d) Contextual factors, such as factors of character, could not model actions.

After analyzing social psychologists both psychologists found that only the differences among conditions and behavior were also round the that's why "option c" is correct, and certain choices were wrong, which can be described as follows:

"the importance of the japanese economy and security is far greater than that of the asian values"

the article must be ratified by three-fourths (38) of states within a proscribed deadline.

source: