Identify the attributes of a research study that do and do not directly influence the causal interpretability of the results. Also, tell the attributes of a study that can make it harder to maintain ongoing equivalence, and so, casual interpretability.

Explanation:

one

Start with the relationships and generalizations that the results themselves keep with report. Obviously, the results come from the development of the report, so you must show these relationships in the analysis of results.

two

Point out the unresolved aspects and do not try to hide them. Define what does not add up. In some trials there may be some result that does not fit or match the development of the research. You must point it out and leave the subject open.

3

Show the relationships of your results with previously published works, and also show the new conclusions of your essay.

4

Explain what are the theoretical bases of the investigation and the possible practical applications that it may have. Where your conclusions come from and what they are for.

5

Formulate the conclusions in detail and clearly.

6

Give recommendations or suggestions if necessary, to facilitate the compression of the report.

7

Finally, summarize the evidence that collects that information as well as the sources

true

explanation:

the answer is a. monarch