Social Studies, 26.02.2020 16:44 labarmakenzie7855

are phonetic constituents that distinguish between phonemes (p. 77). Certain sound properties might be similar between phonemes, others dissimilar. Take [m] and [n] as examples. Both are similar in respect to manner of articulation, both are nasals. However, they are dissimilar in respect to place of articulation, bilabial in the case of [m], alveolar in the case of [n]. These dissimilar features establish [m] and [n] as separate phonemes of General American English. Distinctive features are used to analyze these similarities and dissimilarities. Distinctive features were envisioned as a means to categorize all the speech sounds in all the languages of the world.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: graceaowen

Distinctive features are phonetic constituents that distinguish between phonemes.

Explanation:

Distinctive features are the most basic unit of phonological structure that can be analyzed. They concern classes that distinguish between phonemes such as manner and place of articulation. A different example than the one given in the question would be between the phonemes t and d. They are both alveolar phonemes - meaning the tip of the tongue touches the gum behind the front teeth. The distinctive feature between them is the fact that t is voiceless while d is voiced. That is, t does not use the vocal cords while d does.

Answer from: Quest

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write

explanation:

Answer from: Quest

its tr3way you already know

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 04:30

According to your text, systems of government in the united states are shifting from what to what?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:20

When were criminals first used to create a system to catch other criminals

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:30

How did the spanish prove to be excellent allies in the war? give examples?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30

An employee of the state government always received his state paycheck on the last workday of the month. the employee was not a good money manager, and just barely managed to make it from paycheck to paycheck each month. on the second to the last workday of the month, the employee had $45 in his checking account, and, needing to buy a birthday gift for his sister, he wrote a check to a gift boutique for $100. he knew that he would be receiving his paycheck the next day, so he could deposit the paycheck before the check would be sent to the bank.however, unbeknownst to the employee, the state legislature was having a budget impasse. because the state constitution prohibited any deficit spending, state employees were not paid as usual. without a paycheck to deposit, the check written to the gift boutique was returned for insufficient funds. the merchant complained to the police, who arrested the employee and charged him under a statute that prohibited "issuing a check knowing that it is drawn against insufficient funds, with intent to defraud the payee of the check."what should be the outcome of the employee's prosecution? a not guilty, because the employee intended to deposit his paycheck the next day.b not guilty, because it was reasonable for the employee to expect that he would receive his paycheck as usual.c guilty, because the employee knew when he wrote the check that he did not have sufficient funds in his account to honor it.d guilty, because reliance on a future source of income does not vitiate the employee's violation of the statute when he wrote the check.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

are phonetic constituents that distinguish between phonemes (p. 77). Certain sound properties might...

Questions