Should policy analysts and policymakers try to deal wit the fundamental causes of social problems such as crime, poverty, or homelessness, or aim instead for a more pragmatic and limited approach that may be more realistic and more politically acceptable? Why do you think so?

I think they should try to deal wit the fundamental causes of social problems.

Explanation:you can deal with an issue in as practical and real way as you can but if the causes are not dealt with, this will mean the issue will come back and keep coming back no matter how hard you deal with it. Only if you tackle the cause of these problems you can then be assured that their effect are likely to decrease.

abolish

do away with

unanimous

in complete agreement

secede

separate; break free

inauguration

starting a new position with a formal ceremony.

cooperationist

people who wanted the north to cooperate with the south

surrender

to give up

volunteer

perform a service for free

draft

involuntary service in military

retreat

withdraw; move away from enemy

advisor

expert who gives advice

explanation:

the article must be ratified by three-fourths (38) of states within a proscribed deadline.

source: