There are reasons it would be hard to make lawsagainst emotional appeals in ads, since even if they seem exaggerated orinaccurate, they are unquantifiable; thus, there is no way to prove this.

True

Explanation:

Manipulating emotion is often very effective to influence consumers' behavior through ads. People tend to be more likely to purchase a certain product if they believe they will feel positive emotion after purchasing the product rather than objectively determining Tehran the product is beneficial for them.

It's true that this technique can be considered borderline unethical.

But, this is very hard to prove. Which make it impossible for the government to make laws that prevent it.

For example,

You can really proof that a certain image in the ads is making people sad since different people can feel wide variety of emotion even when they're seeing the same thing.

the question deals with financial planning and the answer is that dan did not stay on budget due to the fact that this guy needs to start decreasing his discretionary spending. according to the financial plan, he needed to balance his expenses and resources.

question 1: the kuwaiti government announced us$1.5 million in aid for rohingya refugees.they pointed out that it was imperative to take immediate and concrete steps to ramp up pressure on myanmar to put an end to the violence.and said   that they r just shameful

question 2: the rohingyas were not aloud to be seen as people in myanmar.in the last few years, before the latest crisis, thousands of rohingya were making perilous journeys out of myanmar to escape communal violence or alleged abuses by the security forces.the latest exodus began on 25 august 2017 after rohingya arsa militants launched deadly attacks on more than 30 police posts.rohingyas arriving in an area known as cox's bazaar - a district in bangladesh - say they fled after troops, backed by local buddhist mobs, responded by burning their villages and attacking and killing civilians.