4. Canada's government proposed that color photographs of diseased hearts and cancerous lungs and lips be printed on the front and back panels of every pack of cigarettes sold in that country. Canada's tobacco industry claimed the practice would be illegal.8 Is there an ethical issue in this case? If you believe there is, explain why. If not, explain why not

Yes, there is an ethical problem in the Canadian government's decision.

Explanation:

We know that the cigarette industry is obliged to add to the cigarette boxes, photographs that show the health problems that smoking can trigger. These problems are very serious and destructive, generating horrible images that aim to encourage people to stop smoking.

As the images are very strong, the ideal, for an ethical matter is to keep them in black and white, because leaving them in color can trigger psychological problems, malaise and intense discomfort in people. Provoking these sensations on purpose is very unethical.

well it depends i think people around the world are coming around to gay marriage. but if you are talking abortion then wow, so much to talk about. such as men thinking they have the right to choose if women can, the fact there are health concerns if the women can't get one, and many more arguments to discuss. so i would definitely say abortion would be a much more interesting topic.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.