Why was federal system felt necessary in Nepal?)

In the past, Nepal tried to divide is nation into several smaller regions. Each regions were given the autonomy to rule itself like a smaller nations. But as it turned out, the system did not work very well.

Some regions were heavily underdeveloped compared to the others. On top of that, these regions often involved in a conflict with one another. Causing internal damage within Nepal and made it a vulnerable target for other countries.

This is why federal system felt as a necessary option for Nepal. By centralizing the government and forcing all regions to follow its regulation,  Nepal hoped to eliminate disparities between regions, solve the internal conflicts , and ensure that all parts of Nepal were proportionally developed.

answer: bvvvulhbjvuohu

explanation:

opoiokji

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )