Michael is in sociology class and the teacher poses a debate did Ramses the second die of tuberculosis? the class studies the phenomenon of science wars in this war Michaels on the team that will defend Bruno Latour‘s view. michael argues that Ramses the second

Michael would argue that Ramses the Second died of causes that are not to be known as it is impossible to figure them out.

Explanation:

Bruno Latour is known for his work in the studies in the filed of science and technology studies. However, his study of the practice of science was indeed at one time associated with the post truth and social constructionist movements and approaches.

Michael to take a constructionist stance would be to assume that it is impossible for such a statement to be made regarding an ancient King on the basis of meager evidence for his tuberculosis.

So he would insist that it cannot be known how he died.

if you have to make a general question and respond to your thoughts, then this isn't really a question someone can you on. read the passage, form your question, and answer using your thoughts. no one else can understand how you interpreted this text if you don't tell us.

where is the rest of the question. this isn't making sense. can you upload a picture of the question?