subject
Social Studies, 16.03.2020 21:11 2kdragginppl

A child learning English as an L1 or an adult learning English as an L2 may put the past tense -ed morpheme onto irregular verbs; for example, they may say finded instead of found, or goed instead of went. This phenomenon is called .

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 17:30
How was japans development influenced by its landforms, its climate, and its proximity to china and korea?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:50
According to subpart d, research with children may be eligible for exemption when: the children will be asked to complete a surveythe research involves the use of educational teststhe children will be interviewed by the researcher.the research with children will involve participant observation with researcher interaction.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:40
How has our understanding of the first sentence of the declaration of independence changed over time?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
A child learning English as an L1 or an adult learning English as an L2 may put the past tense -ed m...
Questions
question
History, 22.10.2021 14:00
question
History, 22.10.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 22.10.2021 14:00
question
English, 22.10.2021 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722360