Social Studies, 17.03.2020 01:01 ballerthesavage3287

Eliminating poverty is not a good that the private market can provide. No single individual can solve the problem of poverty and those who do not donate to charity can free-ride on the generosity of others. If we all prefer to live in a society without poverty, taxing the wealthy to raise the living standards of the poor may be able to make everyone better off.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 17:00

Match each economist to his economic belief. a.) adam smith b.) friedrich von hayek c.) milton friedman d.) john manyard keynes 1.) less government intervention gives more people economic freedom. 2.) government should not control the money supply. 3.) government intervention is necessary for stability. 4.) competition is a regulatory force.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:00

Quick using the information in the graph, one might speculate that a) w.w.i created increased job opportunities in the u.s. b) the election of president hoover in 1936 caused unemployment to decline. c) the return of soldiers following w.w.ii caused unemployment to increase in the u.s. d) the new deal programs of president roosevelt created employment opportunities in the u.s.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:30

Which fundamental freedoms do citizens of both washington and the united states have in common freedom of education freedom to assemble freedom of earnings freedom of religion freedom of speech

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 08:00

Highlight ideas in this passage that show why the anti-federalists objected to the constitution. if it were possible to consolidate the states, and preserve the features of a free government . . [w]ealth, offices, and the benefits of government would collect in the center: and the extreme states . . become much less important. . i still believe a complete federal bill of rights to be very practicable. which reasons below explain why the anti-federalists objected to the constitution? check all that apply power would be too centralized. a bill of rights was included. states would become less powerful. a bill of rights was not included. states would become more powerful.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Eliminating poverty is not a good that the private market can provide. No single individual can solv...

Questions