1. Define: popular sovereignty, limited govern- ment, rule of law, separation of powers, checks and balances, judicial review, unconstitutional, federalism 2. What two factors led the Framers to create a federal system of government

Popular Sovereignty is a belief that the authority of its government are formed and maintained by people's support through their representatives.

Limited government: This is type of government that is empowered and restricted by law

Rule of law: This is a well-defined and established laws that restrict people and institutions and fairly applied and enforced

separation of power: A situation in which the three arms of government are kept separate.

checks and balances: A situation where each branch of government is empowered prevented from other branch's actions

Judicial review:  This is the power given to a court to decide whether government decision or law is constitutional.

Unconstitutional : An action which violate the authority and rights stated in the constitution.

Federalism: This is type of government in which power is divided between national and state and local government.

2. Threat to liberty and Abuse

Explanation:

All these are very important to know in government and adhered to as a citizen.

popular sovereighty where authority is formed and maintained by people's surport through their represeentatives. Limited power, power is given but restricted by constitution. Rule of law is very important for fairness, everybody is accountable by law. In separation of power, Federal, state and local government are kept separate and check and balance applied here.

In judicial review, government are being cautioned by judicial who decide whether the action taken is constitutional and when an action parformed is not in the written constitution, then it is unconstituonal.

Threat to individual liberty and abuse of power led to creation of federal system of goverment.

well considering i can't see the graph, it's probably prices

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.