A young man was walking home at night when he passed a police car. The officer inside had previously arrested the young man for drug possession. The young man raised his hands in the air and proclaimed that he was clean this time. The officer got out of the car and began to search the young man.
Did the young man consent to the search?

A) Yes, his actions indicated he was willing to prove to the officer he was clean.
B) Yes, he didn't put up a fight of any sort.
C) No, the officer failed to have him sign a waiver.
D) No, consent must be unequivocal and specific.

option D:No, consent must be unequivocal and specific

Explanation: consent should be given only freely. A consent is usually specific, undeniable. A consent search is when a person has agree to be search. The law state a person has the right to resist any search. A search must be consented to and the officers response for the search must provide a warrant. It is unjust and highly offensive to search without a warrant because the person may sue the officers for damages and unjust searching.

fast by juice wrld

explanation:

this statement is true.

forests are public goods, available for everybody. when usage of such a good becomes interesting for consumers and its usage increases, there can be a risk of overexploitation. it is a non rival good therefore, if one person consumes the good it does not reduce the availability for subsequent consumers.

these caracteristics require the establishment of measures in order to prevent the destruction of a commonly owned space, for example, to restrict the amount of people that have access to the same time.