What is your opinion? Should judges be guided by a philosophy of judicial activism or judicial restraint

In my opinion, the judges should be guided by judicial restraint

Explanation:

In sharing more light on why judges should adopt the judicial restraint while adjudicating on a case is because it will avert all judges to follow what the law says while delivering judgment on any case that they dealing on. This form of restraint enables direction and control over any form of arbitrary use of privileges that a judge might use in handling of cases. It leads comportment and respect for the constitution because no judgement will be giving out of what it is stated in the constitution.

However, it must be stated that judicial activism should be not be use as a guide because it might resulted into abuse use of power by judges which my deny fear hearing. Imaging a Judge delivering judgment because he or she do not like your face.

abu bakr, was a senior companion and—through his daughter aisha—a father-in-law of the islamic prophet muhammad. abu bakr became the first openly declared muslim outside muhammad's family. abu bakr served as a trusted advisor to muhammad.