The experiment was replicated with the addition of another variable: when playing the trust game, the participants were told either that the other player was a student at their university or was a student at a rival university. Based on the findings in the passage and research on in-group and out-group dynamics, which outcome is most likely

when playing the trust game, if the participants were told that the other player was a student at their university, the participants put on a psychological attitude of belonging, inclusiveness and membership, and this speaks about the in-group dynamics. On the contrary, when playing the trust game, if the participants were told that the other player was a student from a rival university, the participants put on a psychological attitude of not identifying, or nonmembership. This tells about the out-group dynamics of the participants.  For example, people may find it psychologically meaningful to view themselves according to their race, culture, gender or religion. It has been found that the psychological membership of social groups and categories is associated with a wide variety of what situation is prevalent.

in this scenario it would be the consumer demand as most influential in making the decision. the band members need to figure out where and from whom they will make the most money, in other words who out of the two consumer groups - football fans or car drivers - will spend their money, who is more likely to contribute to their cause and buy what they are offering.

usually, however, secession was popular enough without the of community leaders. prominent unionists, on the other hand, were a major reason that texas did not secede before march 1861. the most important of these was sam houston, the governor of the state from 1859 to 1861.

can i have brainlest