Which of the following must be true about any acceptable product code?

a. The numeral 1 appears in some positions before the numeral 2.
b. The numeral 1 appears in some position before the numeral 3.
c. The numeral 2 appears is some position before the numeral 3.
d. The numeral 3 appears in some position before the numeral 0.
e. The numeral 4 appears in some position before the numeral 3.

The answer is The numeral 2 appears is some position before the numeral 3.

Explanation:

Product Code is basically a barcode with 12 numbers. The combination of numbers is what makes them unique and identifiable. This allows both online and offline retailers to identify and track sales of your product within their inventory system.

An acceptable product code has that The numeral 2 appears is some position before the numeral 3.

Product codes have a number of advantages to businesses and consumers. Because they make it possible for barcode scanners to immediately identify a product and its associated price, UPCs improve speed.

They improve efficiency and productivity, by eliminating the need to manually enter product information.

They also make it possible to track inventory much more accurately than hand counting, to know when more product is needed on retail shelves or in warehouses

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.