Social Studies, 27.03.2020 17:15 stuckonquestions

What does the author mean when she says Sojourner Truth made speeches in support of abolition?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:30

You think all professors are uncoordinated, but then you see your social psychology professor make a diving catch down the left-field line at an intramural softball game against the arts department team. you also notice that your professor hits lead-off for the team and is able to score from second base on a ground-out. you maintain your original stereotype of professors as uncoordinated by deciding that this one individual is an exception to the rule because he is a “young professor.” this is an example of

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:30

Catherine sat down will all of her income details from the past year to calculate the total income she had in that period. after she created a consolidated income statement, she deducted some tax-exempt income details from the statement. what term would catherine use for this final income calculation?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:30

Persuaded congress to adopt the missouri compromise in 1820. 1.) henry clay 2.) white southerners 3.) northerners 4.) thomas jefferson

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.